Reported ranking
Best and worst sites for AI agents to food local / order flow until payment.
Ranked from recent CrawlDex observations. Last verified Jun 9, 2026. Based on 4 observations.
Publication status
More data needed- 4
- ranked websites
- 100
- best AES
- 80
- hardest AES
- 73%
- board handoff share
Search indexing requires at least eight recent qualifying rows. This page still serves the full table for agents and humans when the count is lower.
Ranked table
All ranked sites for agents trying to food local / order flow until payment
Outcome signal is shown on the same 0-100 scale as the public AES board until split outcome rates are exposed by the board feed.
| Rank | Site | AES | Outcome signal | Top blocker | Last verified |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sweetgreen sweetgreen.com | 100 | 100% | hidden or obstructing modals | Jun 9, 2026 |
| 2 | Cava cava.com | 80 | 80% | login walls | Jun 9, 2026 |
| 3 | Noodles noodles.com | 80 | 80% | login walls | Jun 9, 2026 |
| 4 | Potbelly potbelly.com | 80 | 80% | login walls | Jun 9, 2026 |
Worst-of section
The hardest reported sites for AI agents
AES 80
Potbelly
Top blocker: login walls. Last verified Jun 9, 2026. Low confidence, 1 observations.
AES 80
Noodles
Top blocker: login walls. Last verified Jun 9, 2026. Low confidence, 1 observations.
AES 80
Cava
Top blocker: login walls. Last verified Jun 9, 2026. Low confidence, 1 observations.
AES 100
Sweetgreen
Top blocker: hidden or obstructing modals. Last verified Jun 9, 2026. Low confidence, 1 observations.